• I strongly agree. Astronauts do complex jobs, and they need all the help they can get.
• I agree. But AI robots should undergo proper training.
• I disagree. AI robots can be more of a nuisance.
• I strongly disagree. AI in space exploration can endanger astronauts’ lives.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Most HR processes are outdated but AI can change that.
• I agree. But AI cannot entirely remove “human” in human resources.
• I disagree. HR is perfect the way it is—no need for AI.
• I strongly disagree. AI will only bring chaos within tried-and-tested processes.

View Results

• I strongly agree. We have the technology. We just need to continue developing it.
• I agree. But we must first address current challenges.
• I disagree. By the looks of it, we aren’t making progress.
• I strongly disagree. Why are we even trying to simulate the human brain?

View Results

• I strongly agree. Brain implants, like any technology, can be abused.
• I agree. A brain implant can be abused only if we allow it.
• I disagree. Brain implants can’t be abused.
• I strongly disagree. Brain implants are only devices and can’t be used against a person.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Automated journalists would ultimately replace human writers and journalists.
• I agree. But automated journalism would still need to rely on human inputs and contextualization.
• I disagree. Automated journalism wouldn’t make sense without the help of humans.
• I strongly disagree. Automated journalism should not have a place in the newsroom.

View Results

• I strongly agree. As long as you have the skills and dedication to data analytics, you can become a data scientist.
• I agree. With a passion for data science, anything is possible.
• I disagree. A career in data science takes special skills that not everyone may have.
• I strongly disagree. Only those good in math can become data scientists.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Even a strip of paper can trick machines.
• I agree. But researchers are doing their best to find defense techniques.
• I disagree. It’s good that it is discovered so the cybersecurity community can act immediately.
• I strongly disagree. Even now, there are already defense techniques against adversarial attacks.

View Results

• I strongly agree. It can make AI systems cheaper to develop and more accessible to the general population.
• I agree. But only a few sectors can apply it for now.
• I disagree. It’s too early to tell, and there could be another more effective method.
• I strongly disagree. Transfer learning can only apply to some sectors, so it can’t make a lot of changes.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Only two people hold the private key as opposed to the public key, which is available to anyone.
• I agree. But it’s only applicable to specific scenarios like securing a storage device.
• I disagree. There’s a chance for private keys to get lost, rendering the very thing you’re protecting useless.
• I strongly disagree. Using two different keys would ultimately be safer than utilizing a single key.

View Results