• I strongly agree. It can make AI systems cheaper to develop and more accessible to the general population.
• I agree. But only a few sectors can apply it for now.
• I disagree. It’s too early to tell, and there could be another more effective method.
• I strongly disagree. Transfer learning can only apply to some sectors, so it can’t make a lot of changes.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Only two people hold the private key as opposed to the public key, which is available to anyone.
• I agree. But it’s only applicable to specific scenarios like securing a storage device.
• I disagree. There’s a chance for private keys to get lost, rendering the very thing you’re protecting useless.
• I strongly disagree. Using two different keys would ultimately be safer than utilizing a single key.

View Results

• I strongly agree. We don't have the luxury of time to wait for a real person to answer our questions.
• I agree. We can train machines to give the right answers.
• I disagree. There are issues that only a person can address.
• I strongly disagree. Machines simply can't be trusted.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Unsupervised learning machines are more powerful than supervised learning systems.
• I agree. Unsupervised learning machines have more uses than supervised learning systems.
• I disagree. Both supervised and unsupervised learning machines are useful.
• I strongly disagree. Supervised learning machines have benefits that unsupervised learning systems can’t provide.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Using bad data can skew market analyses and strategies.
• I agree. Using bad data can lead to bad decisions.
• I disagree. All data is useful.
• I strongly disagree. The nature of data doesn’t matter.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Quantum cryptography is no match for quantum hacking.
• I agree. Hackers will always find a way to attack even the most sophisticated quantum computing systems.
• I disagree. Quantum cryptography is so complicated. Hackers can’t break it.
• I strongly disagree. Quantum cryptography will end hacking.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Knowledge representation and reasoning shows that we can do more with existing AI systems.
• I agree. AI can give more value by integrating knowledge representation and reasoning into processes.
• I disagree. Knowledge representation and reasoning can be problematic.
• I strongly disagree. Like other AI systems, knowledge representation and reasoning is flawed and so may soon lose its appeal.

View Results

• I strongly agree. We can all make our own decisions and don’t need regulations.
• I agree. It’s pointless because we all know many will violate regulations anyway.
• I disagree. Ethics is a pressing concern for all.
• I strongly disagree. Without ethical considerations, how different are we from machines?

View Results

• I strongly agree. Edge AI shows us that we can do more with existing AI systems.
• I agree. But as with anything new, it requires more research.
• I disagree. Edge AI’s capacity is limited.
• I strongly disagree. Like other AI systems, it has flaws that will soon make it obsolete.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Many biohackers are now exploiting others for their gain.
• I agree. These practices can easily get abused.
• I disagree. Regulations are not necessary at this point.
• I strongly disagree. Regulating these practices is like thwarting innovation.

View Results

• I strongly agree. We can’t be too lenient about using artificial intelligence.
• I agree. It needs to be regulated but not treated as if it’s contraband.
• I disagree. Advocates should relax a little.
• I strongly disagree. Why should we when we don’t fully understand it yet?

View Results

• I strongly agree. The current applications of nanotechnology are offering significant advantages in these industries.
• I agree. Nanotechnology is poised to bring positive changes but these must be regulated.
• I disagree. The technology still has a long way to go before it becomes wholly beneficial.
• I strongly disagree. Nanotechnology would only add to the current challenges and issues that already beset these industries.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Symbolic AI has no significant use and should thus be forgotten.
• I agree. Developers can do better with other AI systems such as deep learning and artificial neural networks.
• I disagree. Symbolic AI still has a place, especially when it comes to making logical inferences.
• I strongly disagree. Without making symbolic AI successful, further developments in the field would not be possible.

View Results

• I strongly agree. AI is the be-all and end-all of climate change solutions.
• I agree. AI enhances the outcomes of our climate change efforts.
• I disagree. AI is power-hungry and therefore contributes to the problem.
• I strongly disagree. Machines brought us here in the first place, so I doubt that it can help us at all.

View Results

• I strongly agree. We don’t need modern devices to finish our day-to-day tasks.
• I agree. Using augmented humanity devices is not the only option to improve our work.
• I disagree. Augmented humanity devices make our lives easier.
• I strongly disagree. Augmented humanity devices help us increase our job satisfaction.

View Results

• I strongly agree. AI and social media work well together.
• I agree. It’s expected, considering that social media marketers rely on user data.
• I disagree. It’s a little creepy, don’t you think?
• I strongly disagree. AI would make our privacy concerns even worse.

View Results

• I strongly agree. The use cases are streamlining business operations.
• I agree. But RPA still needs much polishing.
• I disagree. The technology is still prone to error.
• I strongly disagree. It will only make employees lazy.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Humans created AI and, therefore, can stop it from forming biases.
• I agree. But changes in the real world have to happen first.
• I disagree. Deep-seated biases could take a while to get rid of.
• I strongly disagree. We’re all doomed because of our technological experiments and rightfully so.

View Results

• I strongly agree. AI machines can diagnose illnesses more quickly and more accurately.
• I agree. Machines can do the majority of a doctor’s job.
• I disagree. Human touch is irreplaceable.
• I strongly disagree. I need a doctor to tell me face-to-face what the problem is.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Fewer and fewer notable AI developments are being announced.
• I agree. AI improvements have seen better days.
• I disagree. Many AI projects are still in developers’ pipelines.
• I strongly disagree. The development hasn’t stopped, and funding hasn’t declined.

View Results

• I strongly agree. It’s the only way that lawyers can catch up with all the backlog.
• I agree. Machines should handle trivial cases.
• I disagree. Machines aren’t capable of the critical thinking needed to hear cases.
• I strongly disagree. AI systems should never be allowed to take jobs away from humans.

View Results

• An Intelligent Agent Should Be Allowed to Learn about a Person’s Emotions.
• I agree. Sure. I trust that the feature enables smart devices to perform better.
• I disagree. I don’t feel comfortable about my emotions being “studied.”
• I strongly disagree. Is nothing private anymore?

View Results

• I strongly agree. It is our only hope now.
• I agree. AI already has several useful applications in the healthcare industry.
• I disagree. It doesn’t have enough data to work with.
• I strongly disagree. Systems, no matter how smart, can never beat humans.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Neuromorphic computing has the potential to take AI to new heights in emulating how the human brain works.
• I agree. Neuromorphic computing works better than artificial neural networks.
• I disagree. I think improving deep learning is better than introducing yet another new concept.
• I strongly disagree. No AI system can ever work like the human brain.

View Results

• I strongly agree. We once did.
• I agree. We can, but it’s a shame if we stop using it.
• I disagree. No, a lot of our technologies already rely on visual information.
• I strongly disagree. Without it, the world will come to a screeching halt.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Robots can meet most of my requirements.
• I agree. I don’t mind being around a robot 24/7.
• I disagree. If I can’t stand someone who’s not on my wavelength, I don’t think a robot would cut it.
• I strongly disagree. I’d rather live in isolation.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Data-driven marketing is more effective than traditional marketing when it comes to increasing ROI.
• I agree. Like its predecessors, it has its unique perks and benefits.
• I disagree. I think it’s just an additional expense for any company.
• I strongly disagree. I think it’s just hype; it doesn’t differ from traditional marketing at all.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Hackers can steal passwords, but they can’t take my iris.
• I agree. But only if coupled with strong passwords and other cybersecurity best practices, of course.
• I disagree. Criminals can quickly get my photograph and use it.
• I strongly disagree. Experts should look for other ways to strengthen cybersecurity.

View Results

• I strongly agree. My patient records should remain confidential at all costs.
• I agree. No stranger should have access to my records.
• I disagree. The government and the healthcare industry got this.
• I strongly disagree. Our records are safe. It’s their money the criminals are after.

View Results

• I strongly agree. It’s the future of AI.
• I agree. It comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages.
• I disagree. It’s not economical because of its computational requirements.
• I strongly disagree. It’s a bit too intelligent and so creeps me out.

View Results

• I strongly agree. Expert systems increase productivity and reduce costs.
• I agree. Expert systems add value to specialized industries.
• I disagree. Expert systems might be prone to errors.
• I strongly disagree. Human experts are far superior to expert systems.

View Results

• I’m absolutely familiar with how AI works and how it helps me with my day-to-day chores.
• I’m familiar but I’m not sure about other concepts surrounding it.
• I’m not familiar but I do have an idea of how it makes my life easier.
• I’m completely not familiar with AI. Never heard of AI and its significance in my life. .

View Results

• I strongly agree. I think superhuman AI systems are here.
• I agree. Superhuman AI is a possibility.
• I disagree. AI has too many obstacles to face.
• I strongly disagree. Superhuman AI is only a myth.

View Results

• I strongly agree! It’s only a matter of time.
• I agree, but not in this century.
• I disagree. We’re taking fantasy movies way too seriously.
• I strongly disagree! Nothing will ever be more intelligent than humans.

View Results

• I strongly agree. AI is the future of design.
• I agree. AI does appear to make designers’ jobs easier.
• I disagree. Unlike humans, AI can’t make creative decisions.
• I strongly disagree. AI use is not sustainable.

View Results

• They could. It’s only a matter of time.
• Perhaps. But that certainly won’t be anytime soon.
• No way! Machines can never replace humans.
• I’m not sure. AI has strengths and weaknesses.

View Results

• With the way things are looking now, it seems possible.
• Maybe, but it will probably take a long while.
• No! Nothing can replicate the intricate functions of the brain.
• I’m not sure. It can happen, but ANNs will have to face many challenges.

View Results

• Absolutely! The speed that it offers alone will open doors for developing new online apps.
• Maybe, if they can figure out how to improve its range.
• No way! 5G is saddled with so many technical problems. And it most likely poses health risks.
• I’m not sure. Its speed is out of this world, but I don’t want to get sick using it.

View Results

• Sure, why not! I trust the government and the entire electoral process.
• I can’t say. Aren’t there potential cyber risks?
• Not interested. I’d rather vote the old-fashioned way.
• Nope. There’s a reason why other countries don’t allow it.

View Results

• It depends on how you use it. It can either be good or bad.
• I had no problems so far with my downloads.
• I heard torrent sites are malware junkyards, so I probably won’t visit them.
• I don’t want to know. That’s why I use streaming apps.

View Results

• No way. No robot can do my job no matter how sophisticated it may be.
• Maybe. Some of it, yes, but not the decision-making parts.
• Probably. There’s an app for everything nowadays.
• Yes. Unfortunately, my job can be easily automated.

View Results

• Absolutely. AI systems can detect threats faster than humans can.
• Of course not. AI introduces more hazards than benefits to cybersecurity.
• I can’t really tell because AI can be used for good or evil.
• I don’t care. I don’t use AI daily.

View Results

• Yes! I want to experience all its convenience and benefits.
• Maybe. If safety and security are assured.
• No! It is way too advanced for me.
• I’m not sure. I’m torn between the traditional and the high-tech way of life.

View Results

• Yes. I hate being put on hold when I have a concern.
• Maybe. It helps me save time for sure.
• Does it? Well, then, that’s good to know.
• No. AI can’t replace human interaction.

View Results

• Yes! It hastens production and reduces costs.
• Maybe, but connected devices need to be protected.
• No! It poses too many risks and challenges.
• I’m not sure. It has advantages and disadvantages.

View Results

• Of course, they are. Computers don’t make the same mistakes humans do.
• Absolutely not. AI systems can’t solve problems the way humans can.
• Not sure. Like any technology, AI has advantages and disadvantages. It ultimately depends on how people use it.
• Does it really matter? As long as the program works, who or what made it isn’t an issue.

View Results

• Absolutely. It nips problems in the bud.
• Maybe. However, it needs support from other cybersecurity specialists.
• Probably not. What’s the point of doing it when you can’t eliminate risks 100%?
• Don’t bother. It’s time-consuming, expensive and ineffective.

View Results

• I believe so! It’s the best way to beat traffic.
• Yes, but I’m not sure if I will be able to afford one.
• I don’t really know. It’s very hard to predict technology.
• No way! I’d give it 50 more years or so.

View Results

• Yes! Finally, there’s hope for all of the musicians out there!
• I’m betting on it! Blockchain can benefit the music industry.
• Blockchain does have the potential but is it worth investing in?
• Nah. People will still find a way to shortchange musicians.

View Results

• Sure! SMBs must factor in ethical hacking to their budgets.
• Yes, but it should be done by an internal team.
• Maybe. It depends on how vulnerable the company is.
• No way. It only unnecessarily increases SMBs’ overhead costs.

View Results

• Yes, but so will cybersecurity defense tools and mechanisms!
• Of course, and their sophistication will also increase.
• Maybe, if cybersecurity infrastructures can’t keep up.
• Nah. Someone great will eventually invent something to stop it.

View Results

• Yes! Its built-in security features make me feel more protected.
• Yes, but experts are taking too long in exploring it.
• Maybe. It ultimately depends on the motives of the person using the technology.
• There’s no hope! I see more people using Blockchain maliciously.

View Results

• Sure! AI helps analysts sort through tremendous amounts of data in less time.
• Maybe. Digital forensics can be an unexplored potential beneficiary of AI.
• I’m holding off judgment until I see more AI improvements.
• Not really. I see AI causing more problems than solutions.

View Results

• Absolutely! Blockchain relying on a P2P network is a perfect example.
• Yes, that it’s possible, thanks to Blockchain!
• I really don’t know, P2P networks still seems shady to me.
• No way! Time will come when Bockchain vulnerabilities will be found.

View Results

• Yes! The decentralized nature of blockchain ought to do it.
• Maybe. There’s definitely a potential that is worth looking into.
• I don’t know. It sure sounds like too much work.
• No way. We’re better off exploring other cyberdefense methods.

View Results

• Great! I would love to hear new updates on this.
• Are you saying that the current AI machines are not ethical?
• AI devices are just things. No need to overthink the issue.
• Nah, it doesn’t interest me at all.

View Results

• Sure. Anything to make my life easier.
• Maybe. Is it worth the money?
• Nope. I don’t see any practical uses for me personally.
• Can’t be bothered. What are quantum computers?

View Results

• With my life. I paid top dollar for them; I’m pretty sure I’m getting my money’s worth.
• Not sure. How do cyber attacks happen again?
• I don’t. That’s why I don’t leave any of them connected when I go to bed.
• Never. I would do just fine without smart devices inside my home.

View Results

• It certainly does. No secrets are safe with BCI.
• Maybe, but it’s too early to tell if BCI will develop the capability to read minds.
• No. There’s just too much hype surrounding BCI.
• I’m not sure. It sounds scary, but it also offers a lot of advantages.

View Results

• Absolutely! The opportunities are far too tempting to be ignored.
• Maybe. All the elements to eavesdrop are there, so it’s hard not to believe that they do.
• No way! It is all just paranoia.
• I’m not sure. I can’t dismiss the possibility, but where’s the evidence?

View Results

• Absolutely! We’re doomed!
• Maybe. If we’re not careful, things can get out of control.
• No way! Something this great will be good for us.
• I’m not sure. It may be too early to tell.

View Results

• Absolutely! Their convenience far outweighs the dangers.
• Maybe, but people need to understand the dangers and apply available solutions.
• No way! No one can snoop on our private affairs.
• I’m not sure. People enjoy the convenience, but the threat of spying is frightening.

View Results

• Absolutely! Both systems working together is enough to thwart any deepfake.
• Maybe, but we need to see actual proof that they can do the job.
• No way! Bad actors are relentless, and they will find ways for deepfakes to bypass countermeasures.
• I’m not sure. The concepts certainly make sense, but there may be too many issues for these technologies to be effective.

View Results

• Absolutely! We should clamp the technology down for good and be rid of the problem.
• Maybe, but won’t perpetrators use other technologies to fool people?
• No way! Banning deepfakes is an overreaction that resulted from the failure to solve the real problem.
• I’m not sure. Perhaps a better way to address the problem can be found.

View Results

• Yes! Imagine how convenient it can be to control devices directly with just one’s mind.
• Maybe, but many obstacles still need to be addressed.
• No way! It’s dangerous to allow minds to connect directly with machines.
• I’m not sure. It could be a good thing, but it may also open up many dangers for us.

View Results

• Absolutely! It invades our privacy. And it doesn’t even work that well.
• Maybe, but how do we fight criminals and terrorists?
• No way! The tech is still buggy and prone to abuse, but these are not unsolvable problems.
• I’m not sure. It seems to be a useful technology, but what if it’s abused?

View Results

• Absolutely! Hello quantum world!
• Not sure. I think it won't change the world any time soon.
• Nah! This is all hype over a mere parlor trick.
• I would like to learn more to understand the dimension of this achievement.

View Results

• Absolutely! They provide a useful layer of protection.
• Maybe, they speed things up for me on the Web, but I give some control to them, too.
• Nah! They’re fossils of a bygone age and are no longer relevant.
• I like the protection, but I also don’t want to relinquish total Web browsing control.

View Results

• Absolutely! Everyone is entitled to pursue their interests and express themselves freely.
• Maybe, but this should be regulated somehow.
• No way! It’s very dangerous and decadent to let people do what they want.
• I’m not sure. There seems so much ado about nothing.

View Results

• Yes! It’s not right that I should lose my job to a machine!
• Maybe but perhaps it’s an opportunity for me to find something better.
• Not at all. No robot can take over my job in this lifetime.
• I’m not sure. It sounds scary, but is it even possible?

View Results

• Absolutely! We’ll be seeing killer AR apps soon.
• Yes, it might be, but it’s taking too long for apps to be developed.
• No way! All it’s good for is making you look like a bunny on your smartphone.
• I’m not sure. It seems useful, but why is there no buzz around it?

View Results

• Absolutely! I value my privacy, and facial recognition violates my rights.
• Maybe. I’m concerned that its potential can be easily abused.
• No way! We need the technology because it enhances security.
• I’m not sure. It sounds like we need it, but perhaps there are less invasive alternatives.

View Results

• Absolutely! We certainly have built a few of them already.
• Perhaps. But that will take a long time still.
• No way! The human brain is too complex for this to happen.
• I’m not sure. It seems possible, and yet the work seems daunting.

View Results

• Absolutely, since scammers employ more sophisticated approaches.
• Perhaps, but the pool of potential victims is getting smaller and smaller.
• No way! People are way too smart these days to fall for phishing tactics.
• It seems people can no longer be deceived, yet there’s always news about someone getting phished.

View Results

• No, it’s far too much trouble and expense for the industry.
• No, the industry will find some other technology that is more viable.
• Yes, blockchain will improve industry processes and make patient care better.
• It’s impossible to say. We need more evidence about blockchain’s reliability.

View Results

• Absolutely. Bitcoin is the future of money!
• It could be, given the right equipment and conditions.
• No way! The investment is too expensive and the ROI takes too long.
• I’m not sure. It seems like it a good business to venture into, but risky, as well.

View Results

• Yes! Just imagine what happens once the technology is perfected.
• I think so, unless we now take steps to counteract them.
• I’m not sure. It’s too early to tell.
• Nah! We will always be able to spot fake videos when we see them.

View Results

• Absolutely! It encourages criminal activity.
• It can remain, but should be cleansed of all sketchy content and activity.
• No! The Dark Web is a symbol of our right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
• I’m not sure. The Dark Web doesn’t seem all that bad to me.

View Results

• Absolutely! I live in an intelligent home right now.
• Yes, but I think smart home systems are too expensive.
• It sounds interesting, but I worry about how technology affects my household.
• Nope. This is a terrible idea that we will regret.

View Results

• Yes. They get things done quicker and don’t complain.
• Whatever. I’m fine dealing with a human or a machine.
• No. They will never be as smart as a human representative.
• I have my doubts, but they’re worth a try.

View Results

• It won’t if all AI can do is automate tasks.
• It depends on the quality of AI’s own programming.
• Yes. AI will help us improve our capacity for learning.
• It’s too early to say.

View Results

• Certainly, especially if consumers know where and when food has been produced.
• Maybe. But what’s certain is that it will greatly benefit farmers and their earnings.
• No. It’s still business, and you know how producers are only concerned about profits.
• Yes. When blockchain cuts off middlemen, prices of food will go down.

View Results

• No. A few adjustments will be made, but the music will remain accessible.
• Yes. Artists will demand more control of earnings and their music’s accessibility.
• Just nope to it all. Technology and music in a statement remind me of autotunes.
• Maybe. You never know how things could work out once it’s implemented.

View Results

• No. It will increase their operating costs, so why bother?
• Only those who value their integrity and consumer satisfaction will adopt it.
• Probably. But most will adopt a wait-and-see before deciding.
• I doubt. Marketers might find blockchain too complex.

View Results

• Why not? Humans are more prone to error than robots.
• No. What if it goes bonkers? I won’t take chances.
• I’d give it a try to give change a chance.
• Of course. The money’s insured anyway.

View Results

• It depends. There are products that are best hand-made.
• Of course. Machines leave very little room for error.
• Absolutely not. You need heart to create a good product.

View Results

• Wake up, pals, that’s happening all around us.
• Probably, but not before another five years.
• Not in the coming ten years, relax...
• Me? Working with smart machines? Not in this lifetime!

View Results

• Yes. They will make travel much safer and more exciting.
• Probably, but not before all the challenges have been addressed.
• They make us too dependent on technology.
• Maybe, but manufacturers or service providers may take advantage.

View Results

• Nope, it’s unlikely to happen in my city anyway.
• Yeah, that’s too much intrusion for me.
• Very much, I don’t see myself living there.
• I am actually excited about all the improvements coming up.

View Results

• Yes. Farming will become easier with advanced IoT technology
• Not if it isn’t organic. Anything else will make me insecure.
• Partially, it won’t matter if we don’t stop wasting food.
• It has potential, but it requires strict regulation.

View Results